<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ZFS on Thoughts and Ramblings</title>
    <link>http://www.cod3r.com/tags/zfs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ZFS on Thoughts and Ramblings</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://www.cod3r.com/tags/zfs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>FreeBSD with ZFS root</title>
      <link>http://www.cod3r.com/2011/10/freebsd-with-zfs-root/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.cod3r.com/2011/10/freebsd-with-zfs-root/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s been a while since I posted here. I&amp;rsquo;ve been busy with a new job, new house, and a bunch of other things. One of these things was setting up my new file server. This is something that&amp;rsquo;s been in the works for a long time, as can be seen from the various posts on &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cod3r.com/tag/zfs/&#34;&gt;ZFS&lt;/a&gt;. I spent a long time researching this, and finally came up with my solution:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I did consider &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.freenas.org/&#34;&gt;FreeNAS&lt;/a&gt; for a really long time. It is essentially a &lt;a href=&#34;http://freebsd.org&#34;&gt;FreeBSD&lt;/a&gt; install with most of the administrative work done for you through a web-based GUI. It hit most of my checkboxes in that it supported ZFS, AFP, Bonjour, and a few others. While this is nice, I found it also to be limiting when one wants to stray off the beaten path. I didn&amp;rsquo;t want to lose ZFS, but I wanted something where I could tinker. I decided to go with FreeBSD.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ZFS on Western Digital EARS drives</title>
      <link>http://www.cod3r.com/2010/06/zfs-on-western-digital-ears-drives/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.cod3r.com/2010/06/zfs-on-western-digital-ears-drives/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;According to the stats, &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cod3r.com/2010/04/zfs-on-different-sized-disks/&#34;&gt;my previous post&lt;/a&gt; was one of the more popular on this site. This was in response to a question I was asking myself before building a NAS box at home. In looking at the components to use in building it, I came across another question. How does one fix the performance of ZFS on Western Digital&amp;rsquo;s green drives with model numbers ending in &amp;ldquo;EARS&amp;rdquo; (WD15EARS, WD20EARS, etc)? I&amp;rsquo;ve split this into sections, with a bold title, so readers can read the parts that are most interesting. I&amp;rsquo;ve described why WD changed their drives, why this is a problem, what the solutions are. Hope you enjoy this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ZFS on different sized disks</title>
      <link>http://www.cod3r.com/2010/04/zfs-on-different-sized-disks/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.cod3r.com/2010/04/zfs-on-different-sized-disks/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note&lt;/strong&gt;: Following this is not for the faint of heart. If you aren&amp;rsquo;t comfortable with partitioning, then don&amp;rsquo;t follow the steps here. I&amp;rsquo;ve read many posts on how to handle &lt;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS&#34;&gt;ZFS&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID-Z&#34;&gt;Raid-Z&lt;/a&gt; on differently sized disks. The goal is to gain the most disk space availability while still retaining the redundancy of surviving a single disk failure. The posts I&amp;rsquo;ve read either would achieve the theoretical capacity, or be capable of expansion, but not both. I devised a way to get both at the same time, and it&amp;rsquo;s relatively simple.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
